https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366508 The Tribunal modified the impugned order, allowing most of the refund claimed by the appellant under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for two quarters in 2016. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing corrugated boxes, filed a consolidated refund claim instead of separate quarterly claims, leading to a minor discrepancy of Rs. 317 due to specific notification conditions. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for the majority of the claimed amount, except for the mentioned sum, which the appellant agreed to deposit with interest to comply with the decision. en-us Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2018 07:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366508 The Tribunal modified the impugned order, allowing most of the refund claimed by the appellant under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for two quarters in 2016. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing corrugated boxes, filed a consolidated refund claim instead of separate quarterly claims, leading to a minor discrepancy of Rs. 317 due to specific notification conditions. The Tribunal found the appellant eligible for the majority of the claimed amount, except for the mentioned sum, which the appellant agreed to deposit with interest to comply with the decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366508