https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274819 The court dismissed both petitions challenging orders related to demands for different assessment years, as the petitioner had accepted the directions in the orders and sought only an adjournment for payment. The court noted delays caused by the petitioner's adjournment requests and filing of additional grounds of appeal. It clarified that the CIT(A) was not required to await tax deposits to decide pending appeals, emphasizing the Revenue's right to recover taxes. The court highlighted that disputed amounts need not be deposited before appeal hearings. Both petitions were dismissed with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Sep 2018 07:20:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274819 The court dismissed both petitions challenging orders related to demands for different assessment years, as the petitioner had accepted the directions in the orders and sought only an adjournment for payment. The court noted delays caused by the petitioner's adjournment requests and filing of additional grounds of appeal. It clarified that the CIT(A) was not required to await tax deposits to decide pending appeals, emphasizing the Revenue's right to recover taxes. The court highlighted that disputed amounts need not be deposited before appeal hearings. Both petitions were dismissed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274819