<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1391 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274821</link>
    <description>A statutory authority may issue a fresh show-cause notice after earlier proceedings are set aside for procedural defect, because the defect affects the process and not the existence of power. Action against an individual officer under Section 76B of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act was also valid, even if the alleged misconduct arose from committee-level conduct, since Section 76B and Section 81 operate in different spheres and the Registrar may choose the appropriate remedy on the facts. However, disqualification under Section 76B(2) could not exceed the pre-amendment statutory maximum, as the enhanced limit did not apply retrospectively to earlier misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 07:20:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1391 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274821</link>
      <description>A statutory authority may issue a fresh show-cause notice after earlier proceedings are set aside for procedural defect, because the defect affects the process and not the existence of power. Action against an individual officer under Section 76B of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act was also valid, even if the alleged misconduct arose from committee-level conduct, since Section 76B and Section 81 operate in different spheres and the Registrar may choose the appropriate remedy on the facts. However, disqualification under Section 76B(2) could not exceed the pre-amendment statutory maximum, as the enhanced limit did not apply retrospectively to earlier misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>