<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 105 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14328</link>
    <description>HC held that compensation on surrender of tenancy rights does not fall to be taxed as income from other sources under section 56 when capital gains under section 45 are not attracted; capital receipts do not automatically qualify for exemption under section 10(3). The court ruled that only gains chargeable under section 45 are treated as capital gains under section 2(24)(vi), and amounts representing the capital value of the asset cannot be taxed under section 56. Decision for the assessee against the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 105 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14328</link>
      <description>HC held that compensation on surrender of tenancy rights does not fall to be taxed as income from other sources under section 56 when capital gains under section 45 are not attracted; capital receipts do not automatically qualify for exemption under section 10(3). The court ruled that only gains chargeable under section 45 are treated as capital gains under section 2(24)(vi), and amounts representing the capital value of the asset cannot be taxed under section 56. Decision for the assessee against the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>