<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Input Reversal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114121</link>
    <description>Advises that where retention or hold sums remain outstanding, the developer should pay the GST portion to the contractor and secure a bill-wise acknowledgement; such payment is treated as discharge of consideration to that extent and thereby avoids reversal of Input Tax Credit. It also recommends contractually defining GST treatment of retention and seeking an advance ruling for certainty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 16:05:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Input Reversal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114121</link>
      <description>Advises that where retention or hold sums remain outstanding, the developer should pay the GST portion to the contractor and secure a bill-wise acknowledgement; such payment is treated as discharge of consideration to that extent and thereby avoids reversal of Input Tax Credit. It also recommends contractually defining GST treatment of retention and seeking an advance ruling for certainty.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 16:05:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=114121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>