https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366491 A pre-emptive purchase order was upheld because the petitioner was given notice, queries were addressed, a hearing was held, and no procedural prejudice or denial of natural justice was shown. The authority also acted on relevant valuation material and on the surrounding facts concerning the alleged tenancy and encumbrance; it was open to examine whether the claimed tenancy was genuine or created to defeat the statutory scheme. No extraneous material was established, and the authority's valuation approach was found to be plausible on the record. The writ challenge failed, and the interim orders were vacated. en-us Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:58:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366491 A pre-emptive purchase order was upheld because the petitioner was given notice, queries were addressed, a hearing was held, and no procedural prejudice or denial of natural justice was shown. The authority also acted on relevant valuation material and on the surrounding facts concerning the alleged tenancy and encumbrance; it was open to examine whether the claimed tenancy was genuine or created to defeat the statutory scheme. No extraneous material was established, and the authority's valuation approach was found to be plausible on the record. The writ challenge failed, and the interim orders were vacated. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366491