<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 216 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to tax the estimated profit on the disputed purchases. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering profit elements in alleged bogus purchases and ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice during assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:14:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 216 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to tax the estimated profit on the disputed purchases. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering profit elements in alleged bogus purchases and ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice during assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>