<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 212 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the assessment stage for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in accordance with the law and the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was instructed to discard the Net Asset Value (NAV)-based computations and adopt an appropriate method for determining the ALP. The related appeal concerning rectification of mistakes was dismissed as infructuous since the main assessment was remitted back. The case outcomes were as follows: ITA No. 2/Del/2017 was allowed for statistical purposes, while ITA No. 5030/Del/17 was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 09:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 212 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the assessment stage for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) in accordance with the law and the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) was instructed to discard the Net Asset Value (NAV)-based computations and adopt an appropriate method for determining the ALP. The related appeal concerning rectification of mistakes was dismissed as infructuous since the main assessment was remitted back. The case outcomes were as follows: ITA No. 2/Del/2017 was allowed for statistical purposes, while ITA No. 5030/Del/17 was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>