<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 208 - THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY - ICAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366472</link>
    <description>A tax auditor is required to disclose in Form 3CD any case where tax was deductible but not deducted on consultancy payments under section 194J, and failure to make that disclosure amounts to lack of due diligence and professional misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act. The record showed consultancy expenses and the audit report was filed after the CBDT notification expanding reporting requirements, so the non-disclosure was not accepted. While the finding of guilt was upheld, the penalty was reduced from removal of name for one year to reprimand in light of the appellant&#039;s relative inexperience, cooperation, and the nature of the default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 208 - THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY - ICAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366472</link>
      <description>A tax auditor is required to disclose in Form 3CD any case where tax was deductible but not deducted on consultancy payments under section 194J, and failure to make that disclosure amounts to lack of due diligence and professional misconduct under the Chartered Accountants Act. The record showed consultancy expenses and the audit report was filed after the CBDT notification expanding reporting requirements, so the non-disclosure was not accepted. While the finding of guilt was upheld, the penalty was reduced from removal of name for one year to reprimand in light of the appellant&#039;s relative inexperience, cooperation, and the nature of the default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>