https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366471 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The 1st respondent was directed to restore the appellant's name in the member register, issue duplicate share certificates, and allot bonus shares with accrued dividends upon the appellant providing an indemnity bond. No costs were awarded. The Tribunal found the transfer of shares to be invalid due to fraudulent activities by the 3rd respondent and held the 1st respondent responsible for the actions of the 3rd respondent. The Tribunal asserted jurisdiction to grant relief despite suggestions to address the matter in a civil court. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:43:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366471 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The 1st respondent was directed to restore the appellant's name in the member register, issue duplicate share certificates, and allot bonus shares with accrued dividends upon the appellant providing an indemnity bond. No costs were awarded. The Tribunal found the transfer of shares to be invalid due to fraudulent activities by the 3rd respondent and held the 1st respondent responsible for the actions of the 3rd respondent. The Tribunal asserted jurisdiction to grant relief despite suggestions to address the matter in a civil court. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366471