<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 203 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366467</link>
    <description>The appeal contested the admission of a winding-up petition by a creditor for a specified amount with interest. The court clarified that an appeal can be considered post-advertisement but emphasized the need for safeguards, especially concerning payment directions affecting multiple creditors. The appellant&#039;s defense regarding disputed invoices and non-furnishing of C-Forms was found unconvincing, with discrepancies noted in their claims. The court highlighted issues with the company&#039;s defense, emphasizing that filing a suit disputing dues does not automatically invalidate a winding-up petition if the debt is legitimate. Payment directions were modified, and specific procedures were outlined for the disposal of the case and winding-up proceedings, ensuring fair creditor representation and refund updates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:39:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 203 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366467</link>
      <description>The appeal contested the admission of a winding-up petition by a creditor for a specified amount with interest. The court clarified that an appeal can be considered post-advertisement but emphasized the need for safeguards, especially concerning payment directions affecting multiple creditors. The appellant&#039;s defense regarding disputed invoices and non-furnishing of C-Forms was found unconvincing, with discrepancies noted in their claims. The court highlighted issues with the company&#039;s defense, emphasizing that filing a suit disputing dues does not automatically invalidate a winding-up petition if the debt is legitimate. Payment directions were modified, and specific procedures were outlined for the disposal of the case and winding-up proceedings, ensuring fair creditor representation and refund updates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>