<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 191 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366455</link>
    <description>The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000 on the appellant bank, and directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the attached property. The matter was listed for final disposal on 8th October 2018, with instructions for both parties to file written submissions. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with statutory notice requirements and recognized the substantial rights of the appellant bank in the mortgaged property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:25:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 191 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366455</link>
      <description>The court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000 on the appellant bank, and directed both parties to maintain the status quo regarding the attached property. The matter was listed for final disposal on 8th October 2018, with instructions for both parties to file written submissions. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with statutory notice requirements and recognized the substantial rights of the appellant bank in the mortgaged property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>