https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366455 Delay in filing the PMLA appeal was condoned where the appellant bank showed that it learnt of the confirmation proceedings only later, had pursued remedies under the SARFAESI framework and before the High Court, and had not been given the statutory notice and hearing required under section 8. The order treated the absence of compliance with the mandatory procedure, together with the enforcement authorities' awareness of the bank's mortgage claim, as explaining the delay. The 54-day delay was condoned on payment of costs, and the appeal was directed to proceed. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:25:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366455 Delay in filing the PMLA appeal was condoned where the appellant bank showed that it learnt of the confirmation proceedings only later, had pursued remedies under the SARFAESI framework and before the High Court, and had not been given the statutory notice and hearing required under section 8. The order treated the absence of compliance with the mandatory procedure, together with the enforcement authorities' awareness of the bank's mortgage claim, as explaining the delay. The 54-day delay was condoned on payment of costs, and the appeal was directed to proceed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366455