https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366453 The court concluded that the petitioners had a legitimate claim to their properties and that APSFC's actions under the SARFAESI Act were questionable. It permitted the petitioners to seek redress in the civil court, maintaining interim protection to prevent their dispossession until the civil court could adjudicate the matter. The decision underscored the importance of determining the validity of the security interest and the applicability of the SARFAESI Act before proceeding with recovery measures. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 08:13:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366453 The court concluded that the petitioners had a legitimate claim to their properties and that APSFC's actions under the SARFAESI Act were questionable. It permitted the petitioners to seek redress in the civil court, maintaining interim protection to prevent their dispossession until the civil court could adjudicate the matter. The decision underscored the importance of determining the validity of the security interest and the applicability of the SARFAESI Act before proceeding with recovery measures. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366453