<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 186 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmed demands for Works Contract Service and Site Formation services, ruling that they were wrongly imposed beyond the scope of adjudication. Interest and penalties were deemed insignificant, and the appeal was allowed, with the order being overturned. The case involved tax liability issues, reduction of demand, and challenges to demands not specified in the Show Cause Notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 07:59:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 186 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmed demands for Works Contract Service and Site Formation services, ruling that they were wrongly imposed beyond the scope of adjudication. Interest and penalties were deemed insignificant, and the appeal was allowed, with the order being overturned. The case involved tax liability issues, reduction of demand, and challenges to demands not specified in the Show Cause Notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>