https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366436 The court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, affirming that the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal acted within their statutory limits by not condoning delays beyond the prescribed period. The substantial questions of law were answered against the appellant, reinforcing the mandatory nature of the time limits set by Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 07:47:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366436 The court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, affirming that the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal acted within their statutory limits by not condoning delays beyond the prescribed period. The substantial questions of law were answered against the appellant, reinforcing the mandatory nature of the time limits set by Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366436