<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 171 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366435</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the demand of duty was not sustainable due to being barred by limitation. The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 171 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366435</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the demand of duty was not sustainable due to being barred by limitation. The impugned order was set aside, and both appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>