<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 170 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366434</link>
    <description>A separately registered unit cannot be refused deregistration, and refund cannot be denied, merely because liabilities are pending against other distinct units of the same assessee. The governing rules permit surrender of registration and do not make deregistration dependent on dues of another unit. Where the unit seeking deregistration had no recoverable dues outstanding, reference to liabilities of other units was irrelevant, and the cited notification also contemplated deregistration in the absence of recoverable dues. The text further notes that the dues of the other units had already been set aside in higher appellate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 07:44:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 170 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366434</link>
      <description>A separately registered unit cannot be refused deregistration, and refund cannot be denied, merely because liabilities are pending against other distinct units of the same assessee. The governing rules permit surrender of registration and do not make deregistration dependent on dues of another unit. Where the unit seeking deregistration had no recoverable dues outstanding, reference to liabilities of other units was irrelevant, and the cited notification also contemplated deregistration in the absence of recoverable dues. The text further notes that the dues of the other units had already been set aside in higher appellate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>