<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 164 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the appellant was not liable to pay duty on the sale of electricity generated as a by-product during the manufacturing process, citing previous judgments and relevant rules. The decision aligned with established legal principles and previous Tribunal orders, providing clarity on the application of CENVAT Credit Rules in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 07:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 164 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ruling in favor of the appellant. It held that the appellant was not liable to pay duty on the sale of electricity generated as a by-product during the manufacturing process, citing previous judgments and relevant rules. The decision aligned with established legal principles and previous Tribunal orders, providing clarity on the application of CENVAT Credit Rules in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>