<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 164 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366428</link>
    <description>Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was applied to a by-product situation where lean gas arose incidentally during manufacture of carbon black and was used to generate electricity. The reasoning was that such incidental by-product generation does not make the common input relatable to exempt or nil-rated output, so the restriction on credit reversal or payment under Rule 6 is not attracted. Relying on the principle underlying Rule 57D(1) and an earlier coordinate bench view in the same matter, the demand on the value of electricity was held unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 07:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 164 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366428</link>
      <description>Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was applied to a by-product situation where lean gas arose incidentally during manufacture of carbon black and was used to generate electricity. The reasoning was that such incidental by-product generation does not make the common input relatable to exempt or nil-rated output, so the restriction on credit reversal or payment under Rule 6 is not attracted. Relying on the principle underlying Rule 57D(1) and an earlier coordinate bench view in the same matter, the demand on the value of electricity was held unsustainable, the impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>