<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 62 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14316</link>
    <description>Amounts received as a share in jagir income were treated as agricultural income exempt from tax because the Tribunal found they represented land revenue assigned under an implied grant, not compensation for resumption of jagir. On that factual basis, the assessee received the amounts by virtue of an overriding title, so the receipts retained their agricultural character and were not taxable as non-agricultural income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:52:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 62 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14316</link>
      <description>Amounts received as a share in jagir income were treated as agricultural income exempt from tax because the Tribunal found they represented land revenue assigned under an implied grant, not compensation for resumption of jagir. On that factual basis, the assessee received the amounts by virtue of an overriding title, so the receipts retained their agricultural character and were not taxable as non-agricultural income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>