<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 158 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366422</link>
    <description>The High Court granted interim protection by staying the retrospective cancellation of registrations under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of not prejudicing parties during ongoing litigation. The court highlighted that the cancellation, if upheld, should not have been ordered from inception, allowing the petitions and maintaining the cancellations only from the date of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2019 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 158 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366422</link>
      <description>The High Court granted interim protection by staying the retrospective cancellation of registrations under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of not prejudicing parties during ongoing litigation. The court highlighted that the cancellation, if upheld, should not have been ordered from inception, allowing the petitions and maintaining the cancellations only from the date of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>