https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274802 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete various additions made by the AO, including those under Sections 68, 69, and 148, as well as unexplained cash credits and investments. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the legitimacy of the transactions and the AO had not identified any discrepancies in the books of account. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the deletion of the additions in question. en-us Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:47:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274802 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete various additions made by the AO, including those under Sections 68, 69, and 148, as well as unexplained cash credits and investments. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately proven the legitimacy of the transactions and the AO had not identified any discrepancies in the books of account. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the deletion of the additions in question. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274802