<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1220 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274808</link>
    <description>In best judgment assessment under the Trade Tax Act, the authorities accepted the dealer&#039;s sales turnover but, because no supporting records or material evidence were produced, rejected the claim for deduction of alleged chemical treatment and ozonisation expenses. The dealer also failed to establish the claimed wheat purchases and the composition of the goods. On that basis, the purchase value of wheat was computed on an average sale price using reasonable available material, and the assessment was found free from illegality, infirmity, or perversity. The computation and rejection of the expense claim were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 06:47:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1220 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274808</link>
      <description>In best judgment assessment under the Trade Tax Act, the authorities accepted the dealer&#039;s sales turnover but, because no supporting records or material evidence were produced, rejected the claim for deduction of alleged chemical treatment and ozonisation expenses. The dealer also failed to establish the claimed wheat purchases and the composition of the goods. On that basis, the purchase value of wheat was computed on an average sale price using reasonable available material, and the assessment was found free from illegality, infirmity, or perversity. The computation and rejection of the expense claim were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>