<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274796</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow exemption of tax on the purchase of horn meal and hoof meal for export under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court found that the purchases were made by exporters and met the necessary criteria for exemption, despite the intermediary process of adding chemicals. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed valid, and the Tax Revision Cases were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 13:01:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274796</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow exemption of tax on the purchase of horn meal and hoof meal for export under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court found that the purchases were made by exporters and met the necessary criteria for exemption, despite the intermediary process of adding chemicals. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed valid, and the Tax Revision Cases were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>