<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING THE INFORMANT AND THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER SHALL NOT BE THE SAME PERSON</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8146</link>
    <description>A prosecution is compromised if the police officer who is the informant also conducts the investigation, because such dual role creates reasonable apprehension of bias and undermines procedural safeguards-particularly under the NDPS regime where a reverse burden of proof applies-and defects in custody, sample handling, witness examination, or unexplained delays vitiate the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:26:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING THE INFORMANT AND THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER SHALL NOT BE THE SAME PERSON</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8146</link>
      <description>A prosecution is compromised if the police officer who is the informant also conducts the investigation, because such dual role creates reasonable apprehension of bias and undermines procedural safeguards-particularly under the NDPS regime where a reverse burden of proof applies-and defects in custody, sample handling, witness examination, or unexplained delays vitiate the investigation.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Other Topics</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 11:26:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>