<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 140 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded various issues back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) for verification and reconsideration, including challenges to adjustments on excess AMP expenditure, application of the Bright Line Test, exclusion of certain expenses, and benchmarking methods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee on corporate tax grounds regarding unutilized subsidies, while dismissing grounds related to interest charges, computational errors, and penalty proceedings as consequential. The TPO&#039;s jurisdiction to determine international transactions and the existence of such transactions were upheld, with certain matters remanded for further examination based on agreements with associated enterprises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 140 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded various issues back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Assessing Officer (AO) for verification and reconsideration, including challenges to adjustments on excess AMP expenditure, application of the Bright Line Test, exclusion of certain expenses, and benchmarking methods. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee on corporate tax grounds regarding unutilized subsidies, while dismissing grounds related to interest charges, computational errors, and penalty proceedings as consequential. The TPO&#039;s jurisdiction to determine international transactions and the existence of such transactions were upheld, with certain matters remanded for further examination based on agreements with associated enterprises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>