https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366398 The appeal by Revenue before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI was dismissed due to procedural shortcomings. The Tribunal found the appeal incomplete as the second bill of entry was missing, and the order-in-review was not provided. Additionally, Revenue failed to segregate appeals based on the new threshold in the litigation policy, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the prescribed thresholds. The judgment underscored the significance of diligence and adherence to procedural requirements in appeals, particularly in cases involving assessable values of imported goods. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Sep 2018 07:49:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366398 The appeal by Revenue before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI was dismissed due to procedural shortcomings. The Tribunal found the appeal incomplete as the second bill of entry was missing, and the order-in-review was not provided. Additionally, Revenue failed to segregate appeals based on the new threshold in the litigation policy, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the prescribed thresholds. The judgment underscored the significance of diligence and adherence to procedural requirements in appeals, particularly in cases involving assessable values of imported goods. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366398