https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366397 The trial court's judgment acquitting the respondents was upheld as the appellant failed to prove the complainant's authority and the foundational facts of the transaction and cheque issuance. The court found discrepancies in the evidence presented, including the lack of transaction proof and credibility issues with the appellant's claims. The court also dismissed the appellant's applications for additional evidence, citing lack of exceptional circumstances. The respondents' defense of forgery was supported by the handwriting expert's report, leading to the appeal being deemed without merit. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Sep 2018 07:47:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366397 The trial court's judgment acquitting the respondents was upheld as the appellant failed to prove the complainant's authority and the foundational facts of the transaction and cheque issuance. The court found discrepancies in the evidence presented, including the lack of transaction proof and credibility issues with the appellant's claims. The court also dismissed the appellant's applications for additional evidence, citing lack of exceptional circumstances. The respondents' defense of forgery was supported by the handwriting expert's report, leading to the appeal being deemed without merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366397