https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366386 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal challenging the denial of CENVAT Credit on inputs used in manufacturing finished goods. The Tribunal held that repacking and relabeling activities constituted manufacturing in line with legal principles established by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. It emphasized that once duty on final products is paid, CENVAT Credit need not be reversed, even if the activity does not strictly amount to manufacture. The decision, based on legal precedents and judgments, set aside the denial of CENVAT Credit, ensuring consistency in excise duty treatment. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Sep 2018 07:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366386 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal challenging the denial of CENVAT Credit on inputs used in manufacturing finished goods. The Tribunal held that repacking and relabeling activities constituted manufacturing in line with legal principles established by the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. It emphasized that once duty on final products is paid, CENVAT Credit need not be reversed, even if the activity does not strictly amount to manufacture. The decision, based on legal precedents and judgments, set aside the denial of CENVAT Credit, ensuring consistency in excise duty treatment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366386