<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1765 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274792</link>
    <description>The ITAT remanded the case back to CIT(A) due to lack of opportunity provided to the assessee before CIT(A) in the appeal against the order for the 2010-11 AY. The ITAT emphasized the importance of affording a fair hearing and directed CIT(A) to pass a speaking order after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard, with a warning against misuse of the opportunity. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1765 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274792</link>
      <description>The ITAT remanded the case back to CIT(A) due to lack of opportunity provided to the assessee before CIT(A) in the appeal against the order for the 2010-11 AY. The ITAT emphasized the importance of affording a fair hearing and directed CIT(A) to pass a speaking order after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard, with a warning against misuse of the opportunity. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>