<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 103 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14300</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on both issues involving the assessment of income from other sources and property. It emphasized the necessity of proving the source of funds in benami transactions and concluded that factual findings should not be disturbed without evidence. The Court ruled in favor of the Department, stating that income from property owned by the assessee should be included in their taxable income for the relevant years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 103 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14300</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on both issues involving the assessment of income from other sources and property. It emphasized the necessity of proving the source of funds in benami transactions and concluded that factual findings should not be disturbed without evidence. The Court ruled in favor of the Department, stating that income from property owned by the assessee should be included in their taxable income for the relevant years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>