https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366381 The court agreed to hear the appeal for the 2009-2010 Assessment Year despite technical rejection due to noncompliance with court rules. It emphasized the importance of consistency in decisions, highlighting concerns about the continuous application of the same order for subsequent years. The court also stressed the need for proper drafting of appeals to rectify legal errors and avoid negative impacts on future cases. Criticizing the Revenue Department's selective approach in challenging orders, the court called for a more proactive and consistent handling of legal matters to prevent revenue leakage. Additionally, the court emphasized the necessity of disciplinary measures against individuals responsible for lapses in legal matters within the Revenue Department to bring about positive changes. en-us Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:14:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366381 The court agreed to hear the appeal for the 2009-2010 Assessment Year despite technical rejection due to noncompliance with court rules. It emphasized the importance of consistency in decisions, highlighting concerns about the continuous application of the same order for subsequent years. The court also stressed the need for proper drafting of appeals to rectify legal errors and avoid negative impacts on future cases. Criticizing the Revenue Department's selective approach in challenging orders, the court called for a more proactive and consistent handling of legal matters to prevent revenue leakage. Additionally, the court emphasized the necessity of disciplinary measures against individuals responsible for lapses in legal matters within the Revenue Department to bring about positive changes. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366381