<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 97 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366361</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Customs department&#039;s authority to recover short levy of duty from an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for non-compliance with Net Foreign Tariff Earning as a Percentage of Exports (NFEP) requirements. The court emphasized that customs duty concessions were contingent on timely meeting NFEP obligations without extensions, rejecting the EOU&#039;s argument for future compliance. The court clarified that the appeal fell within its jurisdiction under the Customs Act, focusing on export obligation breaches leading to duty recovery and overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 97 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366361</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Customs department&#039;s authority to recover short levy of duty from an Export Oriented Unit (EOU) for non-compliance with Net Foreign Tariff Earning as a Percentage of Exports (NFEP) requirements. The court emphasized that customs duty concessions were contingent on timely meeting NFEP obligations without extensions, rejecting the EOU&#039;s argument for future compliance. The court clarified that the appeal fell within its jurisdiction under the Customs Act, focusing on export obligation breaches leading to duty recovery and overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>