https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366358 The court allowed the applications, quashing the orders of issuance of process and proceedings against accused nos. 2 to 12 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the complainant failed to provide specific details about the responsibility of each director, leading to the lack of sustainment of the process issuance order. Non-bailable warrants against accused nos. 2 to 12 were set aside, directing the trial court to proceed against accused no. 1. en-us Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 13:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366358 The court allowed the applications, quashing the orders of issuance of process and proceedings against accused nos. 2 to 12 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the complainant failed to provide specific details about the responsibility of each director, leading to the lack of sustainment of the process issuance order. Non-bailable warrants against accused nos. 2 to 12 were set aside, directing the trial court to proceed against accused no. 1. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366358