https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366357 The judgment clarifies the scope of Order XXXVII, emphasizing the plaintiff's entitlement to summary judgment if the subject matter falls within the provision. It highlights the limited defenses available to defendants in cases involving bills of exchange and addresses issues such as service of summons and adherence to time limits. The court rejects the defendant's application for leave to defend due to delay, upholding the trial court's order and emphasizing the presumption in cases of dishonored cheques. The judgment concludes by stating that observations in the case should not prejudice pending criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Sep 2018 12:12:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366357 The judgment clarifies the scope of Order XXXVII, emphasizing the plaintiff's entitlement to summary judgment if the subject matter falls within the provision. It highlights the limited defenses available to defendants in cases involving bills of exchange and addresses issues such as service of summons and adherence to time limits. The court rejects the defendant's application for leave to defend due to delay, upholding the trial court's order and emphasizing the presumption in cases of dishonored cheques. The judgment concludes by stating that observations in the case should not prejudice pending criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366357