https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366317 A writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Companies Act arrest and bail provisions, and the legality of arrest and custody, was held maintainable despite objections that the petitioner should pursue statutory bail before the Special Court. The Court found a prima facie case for interim bail, noting arguable issues on the applicability of Criminal Procedure safeguards, service of arrest grounds, maintenance and production of case diaries, retrospectivity of the arrest provisions, and the compatibility of the bail restriction and compelled examination provisions with Articles 14, 20 and 21. Interim bail was granted while the constitutional challenges were left for final adjudication. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 08:00:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366317 A writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Companies Act arrest and bail provisions, and the legality of arrest and custody, was held maintainable despite objections that the petitioner should pursue statutory bail before the Special Court. The Court found a prima facie case for interim bail, noting arguable issues on the applicability of Criminal Procedure safeguards, service of arrest grounds, maintenance and production of case diaries, retrospectivity of the arrest provisions, and the compatibility of the bail restriction and compelled examination provisions with Articles 14, 20 and 21. Interim bail was granted while the constitutional challenges were left for final adjudication. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366317