https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366317 The court granted interim bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, and found prima facie merit in the challenge to the constitutional validity of Sections 212(6) and (8) of the Companies Act. The court also questioned the legality of the arrest and the SFIO's selective application of its powers. The applicability of the Cr PC to SFIO investigations and the requirement of maintaining case diaries were emphasized. The retrospective application of the amended provisions was found to be problematic. en-us Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 08:00:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366317 The court granted interim bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions, and found prima facie merit in the challenge to the constitutional validity of Sections 212(6) and (8) of the Companies Act. The court also questioned the legality of the arrest and the SFIO's selective application of its powers. The applicability of the Cr PC to SFIO investigations and the requirement of maintaining case diaries were emphasized. The retrospective application of the amended provisions was found to be problematic. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366317