<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 48 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366312</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving mis-declaration of imported goods, confiscation, value enhancement, classification, import license requirement, and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration as the goods fell under ISRI specifications and the value enhancement was not conducted per the proper procedure. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 48 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366312</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving mis-declaration of imported goods, confiscation, value enhancement, classification, import license requirement, and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration as the goods fell under ISRI specifications and the value enhancement was not conducted per the proper procedure. The impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>