https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366311 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a company importing machinery for a project, in a dispute over duty concession under the Project Import Regulation, 1986. Customs authorities demanded a differential duty due to alleged irregular registration of the contract. The Tribunal held that the registration of the contract before clearance of warehoused goods sufficed for eligibility, rejecting the authorities' claim of non-compliance with Regulation 5. The appellant's appeal was allowed, overturning the lower authorities' decision and providing consequential relief. en-us Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366311 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a company importing machinery for a project, in a dispute over duty concession under the Project Import Regulation, 1986. Customs authorities demanded a differential duty due to alleged irregular registration of the contract. The Tribunal held that the registration of the contract before clearance of warehoused goods sufficed for eligibility, rejecting the authorities' claim of non-compliance with Regulation 5. The appellant's appeal was allowed, overturning the lower authorities' decision and providing consequential relief. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366311