https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366307 The court allowed the quash petition, quashing the complaint against the petitioner alone and directing the expeditious disposal of the case against the second accused. The court emphasized the need for a swift resolution, setting a deadline of six months for the disposal of the complaint. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the legal provisions under the Negotiable Instrument Act, supported by relevant judgments emphasizing the necessity of fulfilling all essential elements to establish an offense under Section 138. en-us Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:00:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366307 The court allowed the quash petition, quashing the complaint against the petitioner alone and directing the expeditious disposal of the case against the second accused. The court emphasized the need for a swift resolution, setting a deadline of six months for the disposal of the complaint. The decision was based on a detailed analysis of the legal provisions under the Negotiable Instrument Act, supported by relevant judgments emphasizing the necessity of fulfilling all essential elements to establish an offense under Section 138. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366307