<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 41 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366305</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in its entirety, confirming the classification of services, the demand and recovery of service tax, the imposition of interest, and the penalties. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 41 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366305</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in its entirety, confirming the classification of services, the demand and recovery of service tax, the imposition of interest, and the penalties. The appeal was dismissed as devoid of merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>