<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 39 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366303</link>
    <description>A composite contract involving supply of goods and services, with VAT paid on the goods component, was treated as a works contract rather than Commercial or Industrial Construction service. On that basis, service tax was held not payable for the period before 01.06.2007 under that service category, because such composite transactions fell outside the taxable scope relied on for the demand. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:54:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 39 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366303</link>
      <description>A composite contract involving supply of goods and services, with VAT paid on the goods component, was treated as a works contract rather than Commercial or Industrial Construction service. On that basis, service tax was held not payable for the period before 01.06.2007 under that service category, because such composite transactions fell outside the taxable scope relied on for the demand. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>