https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366302 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that the service provided by foreign agents for clearing goods should be classified as "Clearing and Forwarding Agent Service" rather than "Business Auxiliary Service." The Tribunal found that the foreign agents were not engaged in activities falling under the definition of "Business Auxiliary Service" as per the agreement between the parties. As a result, the impugned Order-in-Appeal was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:53:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366302 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that the service provided by foreign agents for clearing goods should be classified as "Clearing and Forwarding Agent Service" rather than "Business Auxiliary Service." The Tribunal found that the foreign agents were not engaged in activities falling under the definition of "Business Auxiliary Service" as per the agreement between the parties. As a result, the impugned Order-in-Appeal was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366302