https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366299 The CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order demanding 5% of the value of exempted services. The tribunal found the appellant complied with Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, maintaining separate accounts. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:49:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366299 The CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order demanding 5% of the value of exempted services. The tribunal found the appellant complied with Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, maintaining separate accounts. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366299