https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366298 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided were akin to "Supply of Tangible Goods" rather than "Business Support Services." As the services were rendered before 16.05.2008, no tax liability was imposed. The tribunal set aside the demand confirmation and penalties, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment was delivered on 20/07/2018 by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial), and Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical). en-us Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:49:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366298 The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided were akin to "Supply of Tangible Goods" rather than "Business Support Services." As the services were rendered before 16.05.2008, no tax liability was imposed. The tribunal set aside the demand confirmation and penalties, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment was delivered on 20/07/2018 by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial), and Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (Technical). Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366298