<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 32 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no service element in the case regarding consideration received for developing tools used within their factory premises. The amount was deemed to be utilized for internal purposes, leading to the conclusion that service tax was not applicable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:46:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 32 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding no service element in the case regarding consideration received for developing tools used within their factory premises. The amount was deemed to be utilized for internal purposes, leading to the conclusion that service tax was not applicable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal, allowing the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>