<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 31 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a police department, in a case concerning the applicability of service tax to services provided to banks for escorting and handling cash in transit. The Tribunal held that such services were part of the police&#039;s statutory duty and not subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Citing previous cases involving police departments providing security services, the Tribunal found the issue settled and set aside the demand for service tax, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:45:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 31 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a police department, in a case concerning the applicability of service tax to services provided to banks for escorting and handling cash in transit. The Tribunal held that such services were part of the police&#039;s statutory duty and not subject to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. Citing previous cases involving police departments providing security services, the Tribunal found the issue settled and set aside the demand for service tax, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>