<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 29 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recognized the identity of the exporting entity despite the name change but emphasized the importance of meeting the specific conditions outlined in the Notification for the refund claim to be valid. The case illustrates the significance of legal compliance and accurate documentation in matters concerning refund claims under excise laws. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for further examination of the admissibility of the refund claim in accordance with the conditions of the Notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 29 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recognized the identity of the exporting entity despite the name change but emphasized the importance of meeting the specific conditions outlined in the Notification for the refund claim to be valid. The case illustrates the significance of legal compliance and accurate documentation in matters concerning refund claims under excise laws. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for further examination of the admissibility of the refund claim in accordance with the conditions of the Notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>