<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 20 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to CENVAT credit on capital goods used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products. The demand, interest, and penalties imposed were set aside, emphasizing the machinery&#039;s intended and actual use for dutiable products, justifying the credit under Rule 6(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals were allowed, and the Order-in-Original was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 20 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to CENVAT credit on capital goods used for manufacturing both dutiable and exempted products. The demand, interest, and penalties imposed were set aside, emphasizing the machinery&#039;s intended and actual use for dutiable products, justifying the credit under Rule 6(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals were allowed, and the Order-in-Original was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>