<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 19 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to deny cenvat credit under Rule 4 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 for invoices raised before the amendment date. The Tribunal held that the notification should only apply to invoices raised after the amendment date, allowing the appellant to adjust the credit against their final product. The decision was pronounced on 14.08.2018, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order dated 16.01.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 19 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to deny cenvat credit under Rule 4 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 for invoices raised before the amendment date. The Tribunal held that the notification should only apply to invoices raised after the amendment date, allowing the appellant to adjust the credit against their final product. The decision was pronounced on 14.08.2018, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order dated 16.01.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>