<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 17 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366281</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for denial of Cenvat Credit on iron and steel items. The tribunal held that the extended limitation period did not apply as the issue had been resolved in a prior case. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:16:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 17 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366281</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for denial of Cenvat Credit on iron and steel items. The tribunal held that the extended limitation period did not apply as the issue had been resolved in a prior case. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>