<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 14 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366278</link>
    <description>Classification of the manufactured goods depended on their composition and test report. Because the goods contained no cocoa butter and only 8% fat, they did not meet the characteristics of white chocolate and were correctly treated as sugar confectionary. On that basis, the exclusion for white chocolate or bubble gum in the exemption entries did not apply, so the benefit under Notification No. 03/2006-CE and Notification No. 12/2012-CE remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=532818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 14 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366278</link>
      <description>Classification of the manufactured goods depended on their composition and test report. Because the goods contained no cocoa butter and only 8% fat, they did not meet the characteristics of white chocolate and were correctly treated as sugar confectionary. On that basis, the exclusion for white chocolate or bubble gum in the exemption entries did not apply, so the benefit under Notification No. 03/2006-CE and Notification No. 12/2012-CE remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>